Mib, Inc. v. Superior Court

Good Law
106 Cal. App. 3d 228·164 Cal. Rptr. 828·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1869
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 28, 1980Civ. 58101California2,403 words

Opinion

Opinion

Files, J.

The critical issue in this proceeding is whether a finding in a former action that a nonresident defendant is not subject to California process is res judicata in a subsequent action brought by the same plaintiffs against the same defendant, which concededly has not changed its relationship to California since the former decision was made. We have concluded that res judicata applies, and that the nonresident defendant is entitled to an order quashing service of process in the current action.

The petitioner here, MIB, Inc., formerly called Medical Information Bureau, is a Delaware nonprofit corporation engaged in the business of interchanging information with and for life insurance companies who are its members for the protection of the members against fraudulent applications for insurance. The complaint filed on August 25, 1978, by Laslo and Ibolya Beresh in the Los Angeles Superior Court, alleges that petitioner and certain of its members have disseminated inaccurate and false information concerning plaintiffs and have refused to make disclosures to plaintiffs in conformity with the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.)

Process was served upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.