Pascal & Ludwig, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Deparment of Water Resources

Good Law
127 Cal. App. 3d 178·179 Cal. Rptr. 403·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2542
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 28, 1981Civ. 61902California3,843 words

Opinion

Opinion

Weil, J.

Petitioner and appellant appeals from a judgment denying a writ of mandate that would have commanded respondents to offer petitioner the opportunity to arbitrate certain disputed claims that had arisen under a construction contract between appellant’s predecessor and respondent. (Hereinafter appellant and its predecessor, Zurn Engineers, are collectively referred to as Contractor; respondent State of California ex rel. Department of Water Resources is referred to as State; and respondent Ronald B. Robie, as Director of the Department of Water Resources, is referred to as Director.)

Factual and Procedural Background

Preliminarily it should be noted that a review of the history of this protracted litigation, as described in Zurn Engineers v. State of California ex rel. Dept. Water Resources (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 798 [ 138 Cal.Rptr. 478 ] (rehg. den.), is necessary to a full understanding of the issues here involved.

Pursuant to advertisement for bids under the State Contract Act, a written contract was entered into in 1964 between State and Contractor for the construction of the Grizzly Valley Dam project. State, acting through the Department of Water Resources, prepared…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.