Ellenberger

Ellenberger v. Karr

Good Law
127 Cal. App. 3d 423·179 Cal. Rptr. 583·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1187
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 1982Civ. 61066California862 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kingsley, J.

Defendants appeal from an adverse judgment in an action for personal injuries; plaintiffs appeal from an order taxing costs. We affirm both the judgment and the order.

The Appeal From the Judgment

Plaintiff Terry Ellenberger was injured in an automobile accident. He sued for damages and his wife Dwana joined seeking damages for loss of consortium. Both defendants stipulated to liability and the case went to the jury solely on the issue of damages. After a long trial, the jury returned a verdict for Terry in the amount of $175,000 and for Dwana in the amount of $25,000, of which $20,000 was stated to be for her loss of consortium.

I

Defendants contend that the evidence does not support the verdicts. We disagree. There was extensive testimony on both sides both as to the extent of Terry’s injuries and (as bearing on the consortium issue) as to the domestic life of Terry and Dwana. The conflict was direct; it was for the jury to resolve it; the trial court denied a new trial motion. We have no right or power to substitute our opinion for that of the triers of fact.

II

Defendants sought to introduce evidence that plaintiffs had filed no income tax returns for the years…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.