Ball

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ball

Good Law
127 Cal. App. 3d 568·179 Cal. Rptr. 644
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 1981Civ. 62169California1,412 words

Opinion

Opinion

Roth, J.

On January 12, 1978, a pedestrian, Jacob Zodieru, was struck by a vehicle driven by appellant Amanda Ball. Ruth Zodieru, Jacob’s wife, was not present at the scene of the accident nor did she suffer any physical injuries as a direct result of it.

At the time of the incident, Amanda was insured by virtue of a policy of insurance issued by respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The policy limits applicable to bodily injury coverage were specified in the agreement to be $50,000 each person, $100,000 each occurrence.

Jacob and Ruth Zodieru thereafter filed suit against Amanda; Jacob for bodily injuries and resulting special damages, Ruth for loss of her husband’s consortium.

On September 28, 1979, State Farm filed its complaint for declaratory relief, wherein it sought a determination of the amount of coverage available to Amanda respecting Ruth’s claim, its own position being that such coverage should not exceed the $50,000 “each person” limit.

The trial court, on State Farm’s motion for summary judgment, so decided. This appeal followed. We affirm.

A review of the pertinent provisions of the insurance policy in question provides the framework for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.