Santa Ana Tustin Community Hospital v. Board of Supervisors

Good Law
127 Cal. App. 3d 644·179 Cal. Rptr. 620·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1162
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 1982Civ. 24216California3,413 words

Opinion

Opinion

Staniforth, J.

Santa Ana Tustin Community Hospital’s (SATCH) petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) sought court review of certain actions (taken by the Board of Supervisors of Orange County (Board), the Orange County Health Officer, L. Rex Ehling (Health Officer), the Human Services Agency of Orange County (Agency) and its director, Margaret C. Grier (Director)), which, it is charged, adjudicated and limited the right of SATCH to render emergency medical services under a license issued by the State of California. SATCH sought disclosure by the Board of several documents, the opportunity to review the material, the reopening of the “hearings” with an opportunity to present additional or rebuttal information and a requirement that the Board then indicate to SATCH whether the previous action taken by the Board would be altered on the basis of the additional or rebuttal information. A demurrer to the petition was overruled and an answer then filed. After evidentiary hearings, the trial court made findings of fact and issued its peremptory writ of mandate. The writ ordered the Board to (1) disclose certain evidence it utilized in determining SATCH’s qualifications to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.