Cohagan

Live Oak Publishing Co. v. Cohagan

Bad Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1145·234 Cal. App. 3d 1277·286 Cal. Rptr. 198·91 Daily Journal DAR 12171·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7960
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 1, 1991C008798California4,910 words

Opinion

Opinion

Carr, J.

In this man-bites-dog story, plaintiff newspaper sued an individual for libel and slander. The trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend as to the libel cause of action and granted summary judgment as to the slander cause of action. We shall affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

On May 25, 1988, the Escalón Times, a small-town newspaper, published articles about each candidate for a local election. The article about candidate Victoria Royster was obviously garbled. Gladys Cohagan (Cohagan), a Royster supporter, wrote a letter to the newspaper accusing it of intentionally garbling the article, presumably to influence the outcome of the election. Cohagan included a check to cover the cost of printing her letter as a full-page advertisement. The paper kept her money and printed her letter as an advertisement. Plaintiffs Live Oak Publishing Company, Inc., a California corporation doing business as the Escalón Times, Stanley L. Cook, owner and publisher, Williams P. Camp, general manager, Richard Myers, editor, and Tom Mauldin, managing editor (collectively Live Oak) sued Cohagan for libel. The paper also sued for slander, based on statements Cohagan made…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.