Garth

People v. Garth

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1195·234 Cal. App. 3d 1797·286 Cal. Rptr. 451·91 Daily Journal DAR 12785·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8332
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 1991B060512California1,082 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boren, J.

Facts

Appellant received a parking ticket for parking his unhooked boat trailer on a street in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes (the City), in violation of Rancho Palos Verdes Municipal Code section 10.04.010 (the ordinance). After a court trial, appellant was ordered to pay a fine of $10, plus court costs and penalty assessment, for a total of $28.

On appeal, appellant contends, as he did at trial, that the ordinance is preempted by, and inconsistent with, state law. We affirm.

Discussion

Appellant correctly contends that the field of traffic control, including vehicular parking regulations, is preempted by state law. “The state’s plenary power and its preemption of the entire field of traffic control are stated in Vehicle Code section 21: ‘Except as otherwise expressly provided, the provisions of this code are applicable and uniform throughout the state and in all counties and municipalities therein, and no local authority shall enact or enforce any ordinance on the matters covered by this code unless expressly authorized therein.’ Thus, unless ‘expressly provided’ by the Legislature, a city has no authority over vehicular traffic control.” (Rumford v. City of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.