Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Superior Court

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1124·234 Cal. App. 3d 1019·286 Cal. Rptr. 323·91 Daily Journal DAR 12031·1992 A.M.C. 320
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 1991Docket Nos. B050142, B050255California2,659 words

Opinion

Opinion

Danielson, J.

Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. (Carnival) petitions this court for writs of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its orders denying their motions to dismiss or stay in Williams v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. (L.A. Super. Ct. No. SOC 96347) (Williams) and Secard v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. (L.A. Super. Ct. No. SOC 96301) (Secard) and to enter new and different orders granting the motions.

We have consolidated the two proceedings since they present identical questions of law and fact.

We grant the petitions insofar as they seek writs of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its orders denying their motions to dismiss or stay the subject actions. The petitions are otherwise denied. As discussed, post, we remand the matter for further proceedings on the issue of notice.

Issue Presented

Tickets purchased by plaintiffs in the underlying actions (plaintiffs), for a round-trip cruise from Los Angeles to Mexico on a ship owned and operated by Carnival, contained a forum-selection clause which provided that all disputes arising under or in connection with the ticket contract would be litigated, if at all, in a court located in Florida. The core issue presented is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.