Whittington

Whittington v. McKinney

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1084·234 Cal. App. 3d 123·285 Cal. Rptr. 586·91 Daily Journal DAR 11680·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7659
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 1991Docket Nos. G009835, G009593California2,675 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moore, J.

Defendant Phyllis McKinney appeals a judgment in favor of plaintiff Steve Whittington following a court trial. Whittington alleged McKinney wrongfully caused a notice of default and election to sell under a deed of trust to be recorded against his property. McKinney claimed she was the assigned holder of a note and trust deed against the property which was in default.

Following trial, the court ruled as follows: (1) the note and deed of trust were deemed paid by Whittington and canceled; (2) the assignment of the note and trust deed to McKinney by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was deemed null and void; (3) McKinney was ordered to deliver the original note and deed of trust to the court; (4) McKinney was ordered to cooperate with Whittington and the title company to effectuate the court’s ruling; (5) Whittington was entitled to relief on his causes of action for a permanent injunction and for cancellation of cloud on title; he was not entitled to relief on his causes of action for slander of title, intentional infliction of emotional distress, or violation of Civil Code section 2941 requiring a mortgagee or his assignee to execute a certificate of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.