Heywood

Heywood v. Municipal Court

Good Law
198 Cal. App. 3d 1438·1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 152·244 Cal. Rptr. 435
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 1988D005677California2,424 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thaxton, J.

Sue Urquhart, as executrix of the will of Russell S. Urquhart, deceased (Executrix), appeals an order of the superior court granting a writ of mandamus ordering the municipal court to issue a writ of execution in favor of respondent Georgia Heywood (Heywood) against the Urquhart Family Trust (Trust) as judgment debtor.

Factual and Procedural Background

Russell S. Urquhart (Decedent) filed a complaint in the North San Diego County Municipal Court against Heywood for restitution and rescission of a contract to sell a horse. Heywood cross-complained for payment of board and feed bills and for attorney’s fees under the contract. After trial, the municipal court ruled Urquhart was not entitled to restitution or rescission, that Heywood recover nothing on her cross-complaint, and the parties would bear their own attorney’s fees.

Urquhart appealed the decision of the municipal court. Heywood cross-appealed. The appeals were still pending on September 20, 1983, when Urquhart died.

Upon motion of the attorney for Decedent, the superior court by its order dated January 25, 1984, substituted the Executrix of the estate of Russell S. Urquhart as plaintiff, appellant and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.