Schumpert

Schumpert v. Tishman Co.

Good Law
198 Cal. App. 3d 598·243 Cal. Rptr. 810
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 1988B026932California3,252 words

Opinion

Opinion

COMPTON, Acting P.J.

Plaintiff William Schumpert appeals from an order of dismissal entered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 583.420, subdivision (a)(1) [1] for failure to serve defendants within two years of commencing the action. We affirm.

The relevant facts may be briefly summarized as follows. While working at a construction site on November 30, 1982, plaintiff was injured when heavy winds allegedly caused an unsecured panel of corrugated steel decking to fly loose and strike him on the face and back. On November 1, 1983, he filed a complaint for damages naming Tishman Construction Corporation (Tishman) and Western Erectors as the only two defendants. (1), (2) (See fn. 2.) Plaintiff made no effort to serve either defendant until October 1986, some two years and eleven months after initiating suit. [2]

Defendants subsequently moved to dismiss, claiming that the delay in service had adversely affected their ability to marshal evidence and prepare a credible defense. Plaintiff's trial counsel responded that all percipient witnesses were still available and admitted that he himself had caused the delay by inadvertently failing to monitor his files. After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.