Stangle

Stangle v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Good Law
198 Cal. App. 3d 971·1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 103·244 Cal. Rptr. 103
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 1988A036333California1,368 words

Opinion

Opinion

Low, J.

Plaintiff Donovan Stangle brought suit against defendant Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company for plaintiff’s loss of a sapphire ring, claiming Fireman’s Fund could have prevented the theft of the ring by making a telephone available to summon help. The trial court found defendant had no duty to prevent the theft. We affirm.

Plaintiff purchased a sapphire and diamond ring in Honolulu, Hawaii, in December 1979 in exchange for a $30,000 promissory note that was due and payable in six months. Plaintiff testified he bought the ring “to hold it for a short period of time and sell it for a profit.” When efforts to market the ring in Seattle proved unsuccessful, plaintiff asked Barnabas Britt, a former girlfriend, to attempt to sell the ring in San Francisco and she would be entitled to any sale proceeds in excess of $45,000.

Ms. Britt placed an advertisement for the ring, priced at $60,000. She was contacted by a man who identified himself as Barry Richards. Ms. Britt arranged for a meeting with Mr. Richards at MacArthur Park restaurant. She showed him the ring, which she had carried in her purse, and a written appraisal that placed the ring’s replacement value at $103,000. They…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.