In Re Ernest M.

Fare v. Ernest M.

Good Law
139 Cal. Rptr. 773·1977 Cal. App. LEXIS 1666·71 Cal. App. 2d 890·71 Cal. App. 3d 890
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 1977Crim. 29069California1,073 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ashby, J.

A petition was filed alleging appellant to be a person described by Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 in that on February 19, 1976, he was in the lawful custody of the probation officer of Los Angeles County in a county juvenile hall, and committed to a county juvenile home, ranch, camp, and forestry camp, to wit, Emergency Care Program at Rancho San Antonio, and did wilfully escape from custody in violation of Welfare and Institutions Code section 871. The petition was found true; appellant was ordered to remain a ward of the juvenile court, and was placed at Camp Paige. We treat the notice of appeal as from the judgment. (See In re Timothy N., 48 Cal.App.3d 862, 867 [ 121 Cal.Rptr. 880 ]; In re William C, 70 Cal.App.3d 570, 577 [ 138 Cal.Rptr. 843 ].)

Welfare and Institutions Code section 871 provides: “Any person under the custody of a probation officer in a county juvenile hall, or committed to a county juvenile home, ranch, camp, or forestry camp, who escapes or attempts to escape from such county juvenile hall, home, ranch, camp, or forestry camp, is guilty of a misdemeanor.”

Appellant’s sole contention is that Rancho San Antonio, the institution from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.