Komas

Komas v. Future Systems, Inc.

Good Law
139 Cal. Rptr. 669·71 Cal. App. 2d 809·71 Cal. App. 3d 809
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 19, 1977Civ. 40471California1,965 words

Opinion

Opinion

Christian, J.

John Komas appeals from a judgment which upheld a third party claim by respondent Small Business Administration (SBA) and restrained an execution sale of assets of appellant’s judgment debtor, Future Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

After the sheriff had seized the debtor’s assets, Paul J. Calleja, an employee of SBA, delivered to the sheriff a verified third party claim, pursuant to section 689 of the Code of Civil Procedure, asserting a security interest in the debtor’s machinery and equipment. Attached to the verified third party claim were a “Financing Statement” which had been filed with the Secretary of State by Future Systems, Inc. and a later “Continuation Statement” filed by the United California Bank. The basis of the third party claim was a $150,000 loan from the United California Bank to Future Systems, Inc. (FSI) which had been guaranteed by the SBA: On April 28, 1972, FSI had executed a promissory note for $150,000 to United California Bank and allegedly granted a security interest in the property in question as security for that note. The note, with a balance due of $68,505.70, was subsequently assigned to the SBA.

Appellant contends that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.