Belmont Industries, Inc. v. Superior Court

Good Law
107 Cal. Rptr. 237·1973 Cal. App. LEXIS 1069·31 Cal. App. 3d 281
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 23, 1973Civ. 1899California2,898 words

Opinion

Opinion

Franson, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent to enter its order quashing service of summons for lack of jurisdiction over petitioner.

Viewing the affidavits in a light most favorable to real party in interest (hereinafter “Viking”) the following is established:

Petitioner is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal offices at Philadelphia, and is engaged in the fabrication and erection of structural steel framework for construction projects on the East Coast of the United States. It is not authorized to do business in California; it has never had an office or agent in this state and it has never sold or purchased any goods here. Other than as hereinafter described, petitioner has never engaged in any activity in California. It does not own, use or possess property here.

Viking is a California corporation engaged in drafting services, with its principal place of business at Modesto.

In August 1969 Bechtel Corporation, operating out of its Gaithersburg, Maryland office, was the general contractor for the Baltimore Gas & Electric Company on a project to be constructed at Calvert Cliffs, Maryland. Bechtel accepted petitioner’s bid for steel framework on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.