Petersen

Liberty Loan Corp. of North Park v. Petersen

Good Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 395·1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 1177·24 Cal. App. 3d 915
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 1972Civ. 11097California1,304 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ault, J.

Liberty Loan Corporation appeals from a judgment of the superior court denying its petition for a writ of mandate to compel the clerk of the municipal court to enter a default judgment in an action on a promissory note.

Facts

On March 30, 1970, appellant Liberty Loan Corporation, as assignee, filed an action in the Municipal Court, San Diego Judicial District, on a promissory note, naming James M. Green who- had executed the note as defendant. Paragraph III of the complaint alleged the unpaid balance, of the note to be $253 as of January 6, 1970, and incorporated a copy of the note which was attached to the complaint. The note itself showed the original indebtedness to have been $500 and stated: “This loan is evidenced by a note and is secured by a Chattel Mortgage on Household Goods—Automobile.” It bore the additional notation: “This Note Is Secured By a Chattel Mortgage.”

Service of process was made on Green and proof was filed with the court. The clerk was requested to enter the defendant’s default, and a “Clerk’s Judgment under C.C.P. 585(1).” The submitted documents were returned to appellant’s attorney who was advised that judgment could not be entered by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.