Corona v. Superior Court

Good Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 411·1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 1173·24 Cal. App. 3d 872
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 13, 1972Civ. 13266California3,707 words

Opinion

Opinion

Friedman, J.

An indictment filed in the Superior Court of Sutter County charges Juan Vallejo Corona with 25 murders. He pleaded not guilty and sought a change of venue, contending that pretrial publicity had prejudiced his right to a fair trial in Sutter County. The trial court denied the motion. He seeks a writ of mandate directing that court to order a change of venue to another county.

We turn initially to the standard governing our decision: When printed and broadcast pretrial publicity creates a reasonable likelihood that a fair trial cannot be had, the trial court should continue the case until the threat abates or transfer it to1 another county. (Pen. Code, § 1033, as added by Stats. 1971, ch. 1476; Maine v. Superior Court (1968) 68 Cal.2d 375, 383-384 [ 66 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 438 P.2d 372 ].) “A showing of actual prejudice shall not be required.” Following the trial court’s refusal of a request for venue change, an appellate court may entertain the request by way of a mandate proceeding. In that proceeding the appellate court may not limit itself to an “abuse of discretion” review; rather, it makes an independent review of the evidence and reaches a de novo decision. (Maine v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.