Huff

City of Saratoga v. Huff

Good Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 32·24 Cal. App. 3d 978
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 17, 1972Civ. 30615California13,773 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

On petition of the City of Saratoga an alternative writ of mandate was issued directed to the city clerk of that city to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandate should not issue directing him to give notice of the sale of $2,000,000 of special assessment bonds to be issued under the provisions of the Improvement Act of 1911 for an assessment for improvements to be undertaken under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 on certain lands of the West Valley Joint Community College District which are situated within the city. The assessment is to be secured by those lands and is to be payable over a 10-year period by the levy of a special tax pursuant to the provisions of section 6468 of the Streets and Highways Code. Respondent clerk contends that the proceedings are void for each and all of the following reasons: (1) that the community college district may not circumvent the debt limitation provision of section 40 of article XIII of the state Constitution by prevailing upon another public entity to create an assessment district, composed solely of property of the college district, for improvements to be constructed solely upon that property and to be owned, controlled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.