Central Bank, National Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank

Good Law
430 F. Supp. 1080·21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 798·1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16339
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 1977C-76-2725 SCCalifornia4,040 words

Opinion

Opinion

Conti, J.

This action is brought by Central Bank, a commercial banking institution, which is seeking (1) a declaratory judgment that the defendant Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (FHLB) is without authority under the Federal Home Loan Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1421 et seq., to engage in the business of money order banking, and (2) a permanent injunction to FHLB barring it from engaging in such business. Defendant FHLB has moved for dismissal on grounds of lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, or, alternatively, for summary judgment. Plaintiff Central Bank seeks a partial summary judgment on the issue of FHLB’s authority to engage in money order banking, and the issue of whether a new contract between FHLB and United California Bank (UCB) placed FHLB in the money order banking business. The court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 , 1337, 1361 and 2201, and 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.

FACTS

There are twelve regional Federal Home Loan Banks. These are federal institutions which were created during the Depression to provide a long-term and continuous supply of mortgage credit to the nation’s homeowners and to establish, encourage and serve their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.