No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
196 Cal. App. 3d 223·1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 2324·242 Cal. Rptr. 37·97 Oil & Gas Rep. 504
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 1987B019246California10,512 words

Opinion

Opinion

Devich, J.

This appeal presents several questions concerning the validity of three ordinances (sometimes hereafter referred to as drilling ordinances) which permit exploratory oil drilling and, should that prove successful, transportation of the oil by pipeline.

Occidental Petroleum Corporation (hereafter Occidental) and City of Los Angeles (hereafter City) appeal from a judgment granting a writ of mandate commanding the setting aside of the drilling ordinances enacted by the Los Angeles City Council (hereafter City Council), enjoining any activity dependent upon these ordinances, and returning the matter to City Council for clarification of certain findings. No Oil, Inc. (hereafter No Oü), Pacific Palisades Residents Association, Inc. (hereafter Pacific), and Malibu Township Council, Inc. (hereafter Malibu), cross-appeal from the same judgment.

We conclude that the discussion of the environmental effects of the proposed pipeline contained in the environmental impact report (hereafter EIR) satisfies the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq., hereafter CEQA); that the findings adopted by City Council pursuant to section 21081…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.