Conti

Conti v. Dyer

Good Law
593 F. Supp. 696·1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24442
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 1984C-81-3341 EFL, C-81-4384 EFL, C-81-4391 EFLCalifornia3,655 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lynch, J.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants’ motion addresses each of the numerous claims raised in plaintiff’s complaint, which is brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 and the United States Constitution. This opinion addresses only plaintiff’s procedural due process claim. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied as to the procedural due process claim. Plaintiff’s remaining claims are addressed in a separate order; issues relating to the future course of this litigation are also discussed in a separate order.

I. FACTS

Plaintiff John David Conti was held in administrative segregation while he was a pretrial detainee at the Alameda County Courthouse Jail in Alameda, California. He was housed in the administrative segregation unit, known as the “F tank”, from July 31, 1981 to October 30, 1981, with one short interruption. No hearing was held before plaintiff was placed in the F tank, nor were any other formal procedural safeguards observed. Moreover, no hearing was held at any time after plaintiff was placed in the F tank.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.