Cummings v. Fire Insurance Exchange

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 656·202 Cal. App. 3d 1407·249 Cal. Rptr. 568
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 1988B027690California5,667 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

Plaintiff Mary L. Cummings, (plaintiff), appeals from a summary judgment granted to defendant Fire Insurance Exchange (defendant), on her complaint seeking damages from defendant for its failure to pay a property damage claim and its allegedly malicious instigation of an unsuccessful criminal prosecution of plaintiff. Because the record demonstrates (1) that plaintiff knowingly and wilfully filed a false claim on a casualty policy issued by the defendant and (2) that defendant had a reasonable basis for believing that plaintiff had violated the law in so doing, we affirm the judgment.

Factual Background

In her complaint, plaintiff alleged claims for breach of contract, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, tortious breach of contract (which also included an allegation of a violation of Insurance Code section 790.03, subdivision (h)(5)) and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Each of these alleged causes of action arises from a claim which plaintiff made against a casualty insurance policy issued to plaintiff by defendant. Her claim was for damages sustained when her home and its contents were vandalized. The policy contains a provision (hereinafter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.