Downs

Downs v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 583·202 Cal. App. 3d 616·248 Cal. Rptr. 734
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 29, 1988D006570California2,081 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

Summary

Plaintiff Thomas L. Downs went to work for Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. (Prudential-Bache), in December 1983. He signed an application and an employment agreement, both of which provide for arbitration of any disputes he might have with Prudential-Bache. The employment agreement requires arbitration under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE); in the event the stock exchange declines to hear the matter, arbitration is required under the rules of the American Arbitration Association.

According to Downs’s complaint in September 1986, a dispute arose over trading Downs had performed for one of his clients, the Titus trust. Downs alleges that Prudential-Bache paid the trust $251,000 in losses the trust had incurred and in return received an assignment of the trust’s claims against Downs. Downs further alleges that Prudential-Bache planned to take its claims against him to arbitration before the NYSE. Downs also alleges that Prudential-Bache wrongfully terminated his employment.

In response to Downs’s complaint, Prudential-Bache moved for an order compelling arbitration of his claims before the NYSE, staying the superior court action and consolidating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.