Takahashi

Takahashi v. Board of Education

Good Law
202 Cal. App. 3d 1464·249 Cal. Rptr. 578
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 25, 1988F008684California8,797 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamlin, J.

Plaintiff Mitsue Takahashi appeals from a judgment dismissing her causes of action against defendants Livingston Union School District, Board of Education of Livingston Union School District, Harold Thompson, Dale Eastlee and Hamilton Brannan after the trial court grant ed defendants’ motions for summary judgment in consolidated proceedings Nos. 70836 and 71869.

The basic issue on appeal is whether or not the judgments in the litigation previously initiated by plaintiff in both California and federal courts against one or more of the defendants in these consolidated actions operate as a bar to the present actions under res judicata principles. Decision on the issue presented requires us to determine the relationship between the procedures under the California Fair Employment Practices Act (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) and the schoolteacher dismissal procedures. We will conclude that the judgments in the previous litigation are res judicata on the issues in the consolidated actions and will affirm the judgment.

Procedural Background

Our statement of the procedural background is based upon the record before this court in case No. F000235 as well as the record in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.