Funai Elec. Co., Ltd. v. Daewoo Electronics Corp.

Good Law
593 F. Supp. 2d 1088·2009 WL 29877·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1618
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 2009C-04-01830 JCS; Docket 699, 710, 712, 714, 716California15,237 words

Opinion

Opinion

Spero, J.

ORDER RE POST-TRIAL MOTIONS

I. INTRODUCTION

In its complaint, Plaintiff Funai Electric Company, Ltd. (“Funai”) alleged that various Daewoo entities infringed the following six patents: 1) United States Patent No. 6,021,018 (“'018 patent”); 2) United States Patent No. 6,064,538 (“'538 patent”); 3) United States Patent No. RE37,332 (“'332 patent”); 4) United States Patent No. 6,421,210 (“'210 patent”); 5) United States Patent No. 5,815,218 (“'218 patent”), and 6) United States Patent No. 5,987,209 (“'209 patent”). Two Daewoo entities, Daewoo Electronics Corp., Ltd. and Daewoo Electronics Corp. of America, defaulted and default judgment was entered against them. The remaining defendants, Daewoo Electronics Corporation (“DEC”) and Daewoo Electronics America, Inc. (“DEAM”), continued to defend the ac tion.

On summary judgment, the Court held that the '332, '218 and '209 patents were not infringed, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. Questions relating to infringement and invalidity of the remaining patents, as well as the questions of willfulness and damages, were presented to a jury in a 15-day jury trial. The jury found that Daewoo willfully infringed the '018,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.