Daugherty Co. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.

Good Law
14 Cal. App. 3d 151·1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 983·92 Cal. Rptr. 120
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 1971Civ. 12374California2,468 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bray, J.

Plaintiff appeals following dismissal of its complaint after an order for summary judgment in favor of defendants.

Question Presented

Is there a triable factual issue?

Record

Plaintiff agreed to furnish as a subcontractor a portion of the labor and materials for the construction of a pulp and paper mill on land owned by defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation near Anderson. Upon completion of the work plaintiff filed this action, alleging two counts: the first against defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation (Kimberly-Clark) for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, and the second against the H. K. Ferguson Company (Ferguson) for the balance alleged to be due plaintiff under an agreement to work as a subcontractor to Ferguson in the construction of said mill. Plaintiff amended its complaint to add a third count for alleged breach of contract by Ferguson and a fourth count on a common count for the reasonable value of supplies, materials and labor furnished to Ferguson.

Both defendants moved for summary judgment. Defendant Ferguson cross-complained against plaintiff, but stipulated that if its motion for summary judgment was granted, it would dismiss the cross-complaint.

After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.