Mundt

Mundt v. State of California

Good Law
127 Cal. Rptr. 20·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 1190·54 Cal. App. 3d 940
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 1976Civ. 46280California1,063 words

Opinion

Opinion

Roth, J.

On April 30, 1967, George Renner (decedent) died intestate and on September 15, 1969, an order settling final account in P-524093 (Renner estate) recited “. . . the heirs-at-law of said deceased are unknown ...” and provided, “ . . . property . . . whether described herein or not, ... is distributed to the State of California . . . .” (Escheat order.)

On November 6, 1974, pursuant to a petition therefor filed on July 20, 1971, by respondents as next of kin of decedent under section 1355 of the Code of Civil Procedure and section 1027 of the Probate Code, the court ordered the state to return the escheated property to respondents. State appeals.

The stipulated facts show that: Andrew and Paul Renner are brothers of decedent; respondents are the first cousins of decedent, and respondents have no documentary proof of the alleged death of Andrew and Paul. Respondents concede that if the two brothers Andrew and Paul were alive they would take the entire estate.

The pertinent findings of fact are: “ . . . decedent . . . never married, had no lineal descendants but had several siblings. ... all said siblings, save two brothers, were deceased prior to the date of death of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.