Miller v. National American Life Insurance

Bad Law
126 Cal. Rptr. 731·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 1138·54 Cal. App. 3d 331
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 1976Civ. 35575California4,804 words

Opinion

Opinion

Caldecott, J.

Plaintiff, respondent and cross-appellant William C. Miller (hereinafter respondent) commenced this action against defendant, appellant and cross-respondent National American Life Insurance Company of California (hereinafter appellant) in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The complaint set forth two causes of action: breach of a contract of disability insurance, and fraud in inducing respondent to enter the contract. The complaint sought compensatory and punitive damages.

Following a jury trial judgment was entered in favor of respondent for $9,203.34 general damages and $125,000 punitive damages. Appellant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial. The court denied the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but conditionally granted the motion for new trial on the issue of punitive damages unless respondent would remit $85,000 of the punitive damage award. Respondent filed the remittitur, which stated that “said waiver, which is unconditional for the purpose of entry of judgment, shall be without prejudice to plaintiff’s raising all legal issues growing out of the trial and post-trial proceedings herein in any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.