White

People v. White

Bad Law
185 Cal. App. 3d 822·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 2042·231 Cal. Rptr. 569
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 1986A029291California3,037 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haning, J.

Defendant/appellant Willie L. White appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict convicting him of two counts of first degree murder. (Pen. Code, § 187.) He contends the trial court erred by permitting the prosecution to try the case on the theory that he personally shot the victims, after a jury in a prior trial acquitted him of firearm use in connection with the charged homicides. He also contends the trial court erroneously refused to instruct on accessory after the fact (Pen. Code, § 32) as a lesser related offense. We conclude he is correct on both grounds, and reverse.

I

On March 28, 1979, two bodies were found in a vacant housing project in the Hunters Point district of San Francisco. Each victim had wounds from both a shotgun and a small caliber weapon. At the scene the police recovered a shotgun shell, two .25 caliber shell casings, and two shotgun power pistons.

The victims were identified as Phyllis Lamboy (aka Peanut) and Darryl Charles (aka D.C.); they lived together as husband and wife. The coroner testified that the arms of each victim bore fresh needle marks of approximately six hours or less in age, and toxicological studies on both victims revealed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.