In Re Teledyne Defense Contracting Derivative Lit.

In Re Teledyne Defense Contracting Derivative Litigation

Good Law
849 F. Supp. 1369·1993 WL 522099
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 1993CV 92-6481 KnCalifornia9,076 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kenyon, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a shareholders derivative action brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23.1 by shareholders of Nominal Defendant Tele-dyne, Inc. (the “Corporation”). This action is brought in the name of and for the benefit of the Corporation against its Board of Directors, as well as certain of its present and/or former officers. The Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) alleges a continuous course of illegal conduct in which all Defendants have participated directly, as part of a conspiracy and/or by aiding and abetting one another.

Specifically, the SAC describes a pattern of criminal and otherwise fraudulent conduct by several of the Corporation’s subsidiaries and units, including: (1) the sale of between 9 and 12 million suspect or defective electromagnetic switches (known as relays) by Tele-dyne Relays to the United States government over a period of years, resulting in various civil and criminal investigations, charges, and complaints, including a False Claims Act lawsuit pending before this Court and a guilty plea (including a $17.5 million fine) by the Corporation to federal criminal charges of 35 counts of making…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.