Weisman

Weisman v. Blue Shield of California

Good Law
163 Cal. App. 3d 61·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2880·209 Cal. Rptr. 169
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 1984Civ. 26964California2,763 words

Opinion

Opinion

Butler, J.

Michael Weisman, a medical doctor, appeals a judgment entered on a jury verdict denying punitive damages against Blue Shield of California for wrongful failure to pay claims for psychoanalytic treatment. He claims instructional error and error in awarding costs for witnesses to Blue Shield. We hold the court properly instructed the jury, the witness costs were correctly allowed, and affirm.

I

Weisman was a full time assistant professor at the medical school of the University of California at San Diego commencing in 1975, eventually attaining tenure. During the years 1975-1981, Weisman was also employed part time at the Veterans Administration Hospital in San Diego.

In the fall of 1975, Weisman experienced emotional problems. A psychiatrist friend suggested he see Dr. Alvin Robbins, a psychoanalyst. Robbins pointed out to Weisman a government-wide service benefit plan (FEP) administered by Blue Cross and Blue Shield was available to him by reason of his part-time federal employment. FEP provided coverage for nervous and mental illness to a lifetime maximum of $50,000. Weisman enrolled in the FEP plan for this reason and then commenced psychoanalysis with Robbins at the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.