Jeneski

Jeneski v. Myers

Good Law
163 Cal. App. 3d 18·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2876·209 Cal. Rptr. 178
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 1984B001328California5,109 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lui, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants are Medi-Cal recipients who sought to have the trial court enjoin respondent Department of Health Services (Department), its director, and the Governor from implementing a statute and regulations that deleted certain drugs from a list of those for which MediCal would reimburse and put other drugs on a list for which prior authorization was required. The trial court initially granted an order to show cause re preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order, limited to the named Medi-Cal recipients. The hearing on the order to show cause was set for September 22, 1982. After the first amended complaint was filed, a second judge issued a new order to show cause regarding the preliminary injunction. The temporary restraining order, dated September 2, 1982, restrained respondents from “[implementation of Section 53(2) of AB799 and implementation of Title 22, California Administrative Code sections 59999 a-e (Drug Formulary Section) and Title 22, California Administrative Code sections 51003 and 51056 (TAR and Emergency Sections) as they apply to Section 59999 a-e.”

On September 22, 1982, a hearing was held pursuant to the order to show…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.