Department of Health Services v. Kennedy

Good Law
163 Cal. App. 3d 799·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2912·209 Cal. Rptr. 595
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 1984B001142California963 words

Opinion

Opinion

Spencer, J.

Introduction

Appellants appeal from judgments on consolidated petitions for peremptory writs of administrative mandamus. The trial court granted the petition of respondent County of Los Angeles, Department of Health Services (Department) and ordered the Civil Service Commission of the County of Los Angeles (Commission) to reconsider the appropriate penalty to be imposed upon appellants; the court denied appellants’ petition.

I

Appellants seek to nullify the effect of the Commission’s reexamination of the penalty imposed upon them by contending the Department lacks standing to bring a petition for administrative mandate directed at the Commission. We cannot agree.

The one essential prerequisite to initiating a mandamus proceeding is “that the petitioner be a party ‘beneficially interested.’” (Bodinson Mfg. Co. v. California E. Com. (1941) 17 Cal.2d 321, 330 [ 109 P.2d 935 ].) Accordingly, “ ‘where a party has a beneficial interest in the subject matter of the proceedings and a right to appear, and has appeared before the administrative agency he properly may institute proceedings for review by mandamus. [Citation.]’ ” (County of L. A. v. Tax Appeals Bd. No. 2 (1968)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.