Civil Service Commission v. Superior Court

Good Law
163 Cal. App. 3d 70·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2881·209 Cal. Rptr. 159
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 1984D001619California5,231 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiener, J.

The difficult and sensitive question in this case is whether ethical considerations require disqualifying the county counsel as attorney for the County of San Diego (County) in the pending litigation between the County and the Civil Service Commission of the County of San Diego (Commission). The Commission seeks a writ of mandate after it unsuccessfully moved to disqualify the county counsel. We will grant the writ.

Factual and Procedural Background

Preliminarily we observe the functions of government make it necessary for some public agencies within a governmental body to be accorded a considerable degree of independence vis-a-vis that body. The Commission is such an agency. It is charged with administering the County’s personnel system, in the context of which it is empowered to investigate complaints filed by county employees regarding personnel actions taken by various county agencies, and to make rulings based on those investigations. Needless to say, an adverse Commission ruling is not always warmly embraced by the affected county agency.

The present case arises out of two such complaints—one filed by Ardelia McClure and one filed by William Chapman—and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.