Garamendi

California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan v. Garamendi

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 852·232 Cal. App. 3d 904·283 Cal. Rptr. 562·91 Daily Journal DAR 9029·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5916
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 25, 1991B047146California3,299 words

Opinion

Opinion

George, J.

—The Insurance Commissioner of the State of California (hereinafter the commissioner) appeals from a judgment of the superior court declaring that certain provisions of Proposition 103, an initiative measure entitled the Insurance Rate Reduction and Reform Act, apply to automobile insurance policies issued under the California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan (hereinafter CAARP). (Ins. Code, § 11620 et seq.; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 10, § 2400 et seq.) The sole issue on appeal is whether the superior court correctly ruled that the hearing procedures established by Proposition 103 (§ 1861.05, subds. (b) and (c), and §§ 1861.06 through 1861.09) apply to hearings to set rates for automobile insurance policies issued under the assigned-risk plan. For the reasons that follow, we reverse that portion of the judgment declaring that section 1861.05, subdivisions (b) and (c), and sections 1861.06 through 1861.09, inclusive, apply to hearings to set rates for automobile insurance policies issued under CAARP and affirm the judgment in all other respects.

Procedural and Factual History

Proposition 103, passed by the voters on November 8, 1988, added to the Insurance Code an article…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.