Armstrong

Church of Scientology v. Armstrong

Bad Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 862·232 Cal. App. 3d 1060·283 Cal. Rptr. 917·91 Daily Journal DAR 9172·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5954
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 1991Docket Nos. B025920, B038975California5,237 words

Opinion

Opinion

Danielson, J.

—In consolidated appeals, the Church of Scientology of California (the Church) and Mary Sue Hubbard (hereafter collectively plaintiffs) appeal from an order after appealable judgment unsealing the file in Church of Scientology of California v. Gerald Armstrong (No. B038975), and from the judgment entered in the case (No. B025920). We vacate the order and affirm the judgment.

Facts and Procedural History

In the underlying action, the Church sued Armstrong, a former Church worker, alleging he converted to his own use confidential archive materials and disseminated the same to unauthorized persons, thereby breaching his fiduciary duty to the Church, which sought return of the documents, injunctive relief against further dissemination of the information contained therein, imposition of a constructive trust over the property and any profits Armstrong might realize from his use of the materials, as well as damages. Mary Sue Hubbard (Hubbard), wife of Church founder L. Ron Hubbard, intervened in the action, alleging causes of action for conversion, invasion of privacy, possession of personal property [sic], and declaratory and injunctive relief. Armstrong cross-complained,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.