McLandrich

McLandrich v. Southern California Edison Co.

Good Law
917 F. Supp. 723·1996 WL 88967·1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6584
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 1996Civil 95-0151-B (RBB)California2,432 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brewster, J.

ORDER GRANTING SDGE’s MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, DENYING SDGE’s MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING SUMMARY ADJUDICATION IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS

THE MOTIONS

On January 22, 1996, the above-captioned case came on regularly for hearing before the Honorable Rudi M. Brewster on the motion of defendant San Diego Gas & Electric [hereafter SDGE] for reconsideration of its previously filed motion for summary judgment and of this Court’s sua sponte grant of summary adjudication in favor of plaintiffs that SDGE was not a joint employer of decedent for the purposes of worker’s compensation exclusivity. On January 24, 1996, the Court held a supplemental hearing on SDGE’s motion. At both hearings, Kenneth Tune, Esq., appeared on behalf of plaintiffs and Ned Isokawa, Esq., appeared on behalf of SDGE.

After due consideration of the moving and responding papers as well as all relevant evidence and the extensive oral presentations in both hearings, the Court hereby GRANTS SDGE’s motion for reconsideration, and on reconsideration, AFFIRMS its prior rulings, DENYING SDGE’s motion for summary judgment and GRANTING summary adjudication in favor of plaintiffs that SDGE was not a joint employer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.