Mitchell v. County of Orange

Good Law
165 Cal. App. 3d 1185·1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 1801·211 Cal. Rptr. 563
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 1985G000352California2,050 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sonenshine, J.

The Mitchells appeal a judgment denying their petition for writ of mandate. They further allege the court erred in refusing to issue a statement of decision.

The Mitchells own property at the intersection of Newport Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in Orange County. It contains a historic ranch house, currently used as a detoxification center, and several other buildings.

In June 1981 the Orange County Board of Supervisors authorized its environmental management agency to prepare the North Tustin Specific Plan (NTSP). The project was undertaken in response to increased noise and traffic along 17th Street and Newport Avenue. The proposed plan designated the majority of the parcels fronting on Newport Avenue, running north from 17th Street, as medium low density single family use (for which the areas were then being utilized).

The Orange County Planning Commission held public hearings on the NTSP and its attendant environmental impact report (EIR). The Mitchells, desiring permission to convert their property to professional office use, attended and participated in the public hearings and also corresponded with the appropriate agencies.

Minutes of the Orange County Planning…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.