West

West v. Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc.

Good Law
174 Cal. App. 3d 831·1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2788·220 Cal. Rptr. 437·59 A.L.R. 4th 1
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 1985A021842California16,624 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brauer, J.

Plaintiff Lynette West (hereinafter West) contracted toxic shock syndrome while using a vaginal tampon manufactured by defendant Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc. (hereinafter JJP). In a subsequent action based upon strict product liability, a jury awarded West $500,000 in compensatory damages and $10 million in punitive damages against JJP. A judgment was entered accordingly. Thereafter JJP moved for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The trial court denied the latter motion, but conditionally granted the motion for new trial on the ground of excessive damages; a new trial was ordered unless West agreed to accept a reduction in compensatory damages to $100,000 and a reduction in punitive damages to $1 million. (Code Civ. Proc., § 662.5, subd. (b).) West filed a written acceptance of the reductions.

JJP appeals from the judgment and from the order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subds. (a) and (d).) West cross-appeals from the order modifying the judgment. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (b).)

On appeal JJP contends:

On cross-appeal West contends, in essence, that the trial court abused its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.