Dayton Time Lock Service, Inc. v. Silent Watchman Corp.

Good Law
124 Cal. Rptr. 678·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1428·52 Cal. App. 3d 1
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 8, 1975Docket Nos. 45438, 45929California2,980 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fleming, J.

This is an action for declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and damages arising out of a series of disputes between plaintiff Dayton Time Lock Service, Inc., and defendant The Silent Watchman Corporation, franchisee and franchisor, respectively, for a recording time lock system service. The trial court’s findings favored defendant. Plaintiff appeals the judgment and the order requiring plaintiff to post an undertaking to stay the judgment pending appeal.

A recording time lock system replaces an ordinary door lock. The system, either mechanical or electro-mechanical, records on tape the time when the lock is opened and closed. Sophisticated models indicate which key is used to operate the lock. A recording time lock system service, such as the one operated by plaintiff, leases the system to its customers, installs and maintains the equipment, and provides a periodic written report of the data recorded by the lock.

Defendant manufactures the Dayton Time Lock and directly operates 11 time lock system services located in various parts of the country. Plaintiff is its only franchise holder. In 1960 plaintiff and defendant entered a 10-year exclusive franchise agreement,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.