Cozens

Cozens v. New Car Dealers Policy & Appeals Board

Good Law
124 Cal. Rptr. 835·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1431·52 Cal. App. 3d 21
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 9, 1975Civ. 15086California2,396 words

Opinion

Opinion

Regan, J.

On October 4, 1973, Robert C. Cozens, Director of the Department of Motor Vehicles (“Director” and “Department”), filed a petition for writ of mandate to compel respondent New Car Dealers Policy and Appeals Board (“Board”) to vacate and set aside the Board’s final order upon review of the director’s decision revoking the car dealer’s license of the real party in interest, Williams Chevrolet, Inc. (“Williams”).

During the years 1970 and 1971, the Department filed accusations against Williams, a car dealership, alleging certain violations of the Vehicle Code. Subsequently a hearing was held pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (Gov. Code, § 11500 et seq.).

On October 24, 1972, the Director adopted a decision prepared by the hearing officer which found that Williams had violated numerous sections of the Vehicle Code in the operation of its business and revoked Williams’ license.

Williams then filed with the Director a petition for reconsideration of the decision revoking its license. (See Gov. Code, § 11521.) This petition set forth a number of alleged facts, including the facts that Williams had new supervisory personnel and a new general manager, and that all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.