Hickey

People v. Hickey

Bad Law
109 Cal. App. 3d 426·167 Cal. Rptr. 256·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 2173
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 1980Crim. 3881California5,057 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fredman, J.

Appellant Jerry D. Hickey appeals alleging his sentence was improperly enhanced by the judgment of the trial court.

Hickey was convicted of kidnaping (Pen. Code, § 207), lewd conduct with a child (Pen. Code, § 288) and oral copulation (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (c)) on March 9, 1978, after a jury trial. He makes no complaint of the substantive or procedural propriety of the trial and asserts sentencing error only. By limiting the scope of our review we avoid detailed repetition of the unsavory details of the debauchment of a six-year-old boy.

Pleading of the Priors

The information, as originally filed, alleged two prior felony convictions. The first pled the conviction in Fresno County Superior Court on October 10, 1969, of a violation of Penal Code section 288 (lewd conduct with a child) and section 286 (sodomy). The second charged conviction on October 14, 1966, in the Court of Common Pleas, Miami County, Ohio, of sodomy, a felony. The record reveals that both priors were for offenses factually congruent with the current charges against appellant. Both were pled within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (b), mandating a one-year enhancement.

For reasons of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.