Huff

Huff v. Mendoza

Good Law
109 Cal. App. 3d 677·167 Cal. Rptr. 348·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 2193
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 1980Civ. 57154California1,279 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wenke, J.

Appellant Larry S. Huff (hereinafter referred to as Huff) has appealed from a judgment of the trial court dismissing his first amended complaint after sustaining a general demurrer without leave to amend.

In 1975 a default judgment was rendered against Huff and in favor of respondents Ruben Mendoza and Rose Mendoza (hereinafter referred to as Mendoza) in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona. Ruben Mendoza had been injured while a spectator at a motorcycle race in August of 1974. In that action it was alleged that Huff had an agency or partnership relationship with one Ballah who conducted the race. Huff was served in January of 1975. Thereafter the default judgment was entered on June 5, 1975.

On December 1, 1975, Huff filed a motion to set aside the default judgment. Incident to this he contended that he had forgotten about the papers that were served on him until early in March 1975, when he gave them to his business manager, one Coultas, for handling. Coultas misplaced the papers and forgot about them until September 1975. At that time an amended complaint was left with Huff’s estranged wife. The leaving of this document apparently prompted Huff, through…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.