Browning

People v. Browning

Good Law
145 Cal. Rptr. 45·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1517·79 Cal. App. 3d 320
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 3, 1978Crim. 17113California855 words

Opinion

Opinion

Christian, J.

—Stephen Douglas Browning has appealed from a judgment of imprisonment which was rendered after a jury found him guilty of second degree murder. (Pen. Code, § 187.) The cause has not been briefed. Appellant has moved for summary reversal of the judgment. The motion appeared to have merit. Because a judgment in a criminal case “can be reversed only after argument, . . .” (Pen. Code, § 1253), we have heard argument on the motion.

Browning and three codéfendants, Tucker, Weathersby and Wyatt, were charged by indictment with murder. The cause was tried before a jury, and was submitted. During the next three days, the jury requested the rereading of various instructions as well as the testimony of certain witnesses. At one point the jury asked the court if there was a verdict for a hung jury, and the court indicated that there was not.

On March 24, the juiy returned verdicts finding Tucker and Weathersby guilty of first degree murder. The judge inquired as to the division with respect to the remaining two defendants, Wyatt and appellant. The foreman replied “11 to 1” as to each. The court then directed the jurors to continue their deliberations.

Shortly thereafter, the jury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.