Greer

Greer v. Board of Education of Santa Rosa City School District

Bad Law
121 Cal. Rptr. 542·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1004·47 Cal. App. 3d 98
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 11, 1975Civ. 32952California11,993 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Appellant a probationary school teacher who was given notice pursuant to the provisions of section 13443 of the Education Code that his services would not be required for the school year 1971-1972, has appealed from a judgment denying his petition for mandamus in which he sought review of proceedings taken under that section that had culminated in the board’s determination not to employ him for the ensuing school year. The principal thrust of his complaint is that he was denied a fair hearing on the issue of his continued employment. More specifically he asserts that he was denied a hearing before the governing board when it made a determination of the sufficiency of the cause for not requiring his services, as provided by subdivision (d) of section 13443; that he was deprived of his right to a hearing on that issue as was provided in subdivisions (a) and (c) of section 11517 of the Government Code; and that his rights to due process of law and equal protection of the law were violated by the procedures followed by the board in connection with the termination of his services. He further attacks the proceedings because a representative of the county counsel who conducted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.