Estate of Feraud

Good Law
154 Cal. Rptr. 889·92 Cal. App. 3d 717
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 3, 197954215California1,951 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cobey, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 719 OPINION Testamentary cotrustees, Fred M. Yasukochi and John P. Armstrong, appeal from provisions of a judgment surcharging *Page 720 them $133,876.50, which amount represents the adjusted difference between the total of the annual bonuses paid or credited to Yasukochi by Ramirez and Feraud Chili Company (hereafter Company) for six years (1971-1972 to 1976-1977, inclusive), and 10 percent of the Company's net income after taxes for the same period. The principal issues presented by this appeal are whether the corporate bonuses paid trustee Yasukochi were fair and reasonable and whether trustee Armstrong was properly held liable for the surcharge. More specifically, the two trustees contend that (1) the trial court should have applied a corporate standard rather than a trust standard in evaluating the reasonableness of Yasukochi's bonuses for successfully managing an estate corporation; (2) the evidence in support of the finding of unreasonableness with respect to Yasukochi's bonuses is insubstantial; and (3) Armstrong was improperly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.