Foremost-McKesson

N. CAROLINA DAIRY FOUNDATION v. Foremost-McKesson

Good Law
154 Cal. Rptr. 794·92 Cal. App. 3d 98
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 19, 197940485California3,726 words

Opinion

Opinion

Defendants, Foremost-McKesson, Inc. and Weyerhaeuser Company, appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction in favor of plaintiffs, North Carolina Dairy Foundation, Inc. (Foundation), G.P. Gundlach & Company, and Knudsen Corporation, enjoining defendants from infringing upon plaintiffs' trademark "Sweet Acidophilus" (hereafter "SA") or engaging in any domestic marketing activities using such trademark or any colorable imitation. Defendants contend that the trial court's findings that the term is a protectable trademark through acquisition of a secondary meaning is not supported by law or the evidence. Our view of the record in light of established principles impels a contrary conclusion requiring affirmance of the challenged order.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint for trademark infringement and unfair competition and false and misleading advertising alleging in substance that: plaintiff Foundation, a nonprofit foreign corporation, developed and perfected a new strain of lactobacillus acidophilus (LBA), a fermenting bacteria used in milk products to aid digestion. The new culture and processing technique eliminates the sour-taste effect caused by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.