Corral

Corral v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Good Law
155 Cal. Rptr. 342·1979 Cal. App. LEXIS 1742·92 Cal. App. 3d 1004
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 1979Civ. 3615California3,322 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brown, J.

In this action against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), based upon an alleged breach of its duty of good faith and fair dealing, the trial court granted State Farm’s motion for summary judgment. The insureds, Luis Corral (Luis) and his daughter, Mary Alice Corral (Mary), have appealed.

State Farm’s policy of liability insurance issued to Luis contained uninsured motorist coverage and medical payments coverage. The coverage extended to Mary who, at the time of the accident in question, was driving Luis’ vehicle with the permission of Luis. The driver of the other car was Wesley Warner.

Being unable to arrive at a settlement for the injuries and medical expenses incurred, Mary, pursuant to the terms of the policy, instituted an arbitration proceeding under the uninsured motorist provision of State Farm’s policy. Approximately five years later the claim went to hearing before the arbitrator. Mary proved the facts of the accident and that she suffered personal injuries and incurred medical expenses. The central issue in the proceeding was whether Warner was uninsured. At the hearing Mary sought a stipulation that Warner was uninsured. State Farm…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.