Boston v. Nelson

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 436·227 Cal. App. 3d 1502·278 Cal. Rptr. 386·91 Daily Journal DAR 2468
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 1991B037965California1,610 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lucas, J.

Appeal from a judgment of dismissal after the California trial court sustained respondents’ demurrer to appellant’s first amended complaint. Affirmed.

Facts

First, we note that “[a] general demurrer admits the proof of all material factual allegations in the complaint, and we are not concerned with the question of [appellant’s] ability to prove [her] allegations.” (Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection Dist. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 148, 151, fn. 1 [ 233 Cal.Rptr. 308 , 729 P.2d 743 ].)

In December of 1979, Lucille J. Boston, a California resident, purchased a condominium in Hawaii from Elizabeth Stephens Nelson under an agreement of sale which called for payment in full by February of 1981. Boston defaulted on the note. Following a foreclosure action which involved numerous parties, claims and counterclaims, Nelson obtained a decree of foreclosure which authorized sale of the property and ordered a deficiency judgment. Sale of the property was confirmed on June 22, 1984. On November 16, 1984, following a hearing, the Hawaii court entered an order granting Nelson’s motion for a deficiency judgment of $110,089.61 against Boston. Boston appealed.

Nelson retained Cadoo, Thretheway,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.