Keenan

People v. Keenan

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 104·227 Cal. App. 3d 26·277 Cal. Rptr. 687·91 Daily Journal DAR 1330·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 820
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 1991A046309California3,739 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kline, J.

Appellant Jeffrey Adam Keenan appeals following his conviction of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2)), forcible sodomy (Pen. Code, § 286, subd. (c)), mayhem (Pen. Code, § 203), false imprisonment (Pen. Code, § 236), assault with force (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)), attempted burglary (Pen. Code, §§ 664/459) and attempted rape (Pen. Code, §§ 664/261, subd. (2)). He contends (1) his confession was improperly obtained and involuntarily given; (2) the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for mayhem; (3) the court chose the aggravated sentence for mayhem based on an improper and inadequate basis; and (4) the sentences on the false imprisonment and assault conviction must be stayed pursuant to Penal Code section 654.

Statement of the Case

An information filed in San Mateo County Superior Court on January 13, 1989, and amended May 18, 1989, charged appellant with the following offenses:

On May 15, 1989, following a hearing, the trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress his taped confession as involuntarily given. On May 16, 1989, the trial court denied appellant’s motion for substitute counsel. Immediately following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.